Abstract
Limited people of Bangladesh use sanitary latrine. Even there are some places in Bangladesh
where people don’t use any type of latrine. The latrines, they use, should not be termed as
latrine.
We first started our work after getting little insight about Participatory Action Research.
Then, by consulting with experts, we got clear concept about it.
We collected primary data indeed and we did not go through any schematic format to collect
that data. Our objectives were: assessing the knowledge, attitude and behaviors of villagers
towards the advantages and disadvantages of sanitary latrine and towards the improved
sanitation; building awareness of the villagers towards use of sanitary latrine and promoting
them to increase access of sanitary latrine; using the students as volunteers to aware village
people for using improved sanitation; and making a plan of actions on improved sanitation.
Swalpo Shingjuri is a Char Land area of Manikganj District. As the village is a flood prone
area, so, people there build houses by heightening the earth surface with soil. The quality of
soil is sandy. Total population of the village is 317, where, educated people are 58% and total
employee people are 185. The village women use cow dung for cooking burner. Total
number of tube-well at the village is 29. The social status of the women in the village could
be identified by simple words, “The speech of women should not be considered”.
Villagers think, only use of Ring-Slab-type concrete latrines means sanitation. They don’t
know that other matters of sanitation like nail cutting, taking bath in clean water, keeping
houses neat and clean etc. are parts of sanitation. They think those parts are also necessary.
But they don’t know these are within the public or private definition of sanitation.
80% of the people of Swalpo Singjuri village don’t use sanitary latrine. Although they treat
their pond water as clean, but, it was observed that 30-40 people take bath at a time in that
single pond and many villagers clean their domestic animals in that pond. They don’t bother
different practices related to sanitation. Village women throw their napkins in the bushes
behind their houses, which is not healthy practice.
Later the villagers came to a result after analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of
different types of latrines. They showed some cheap latrine options, like pit, slab-pit etc.,
which can be made within their own available resources. But they did not come to in any
active initiatives. Thereafter, the people, who owned sanitary latrines, became proactive.
They urged the people, who did not use sanitary latrine, to take fast initiatives; they even
warned them that they would take judicial action. Then, the problems of people, who did not
have sanitary latrine, were discussed again. They noticed that they cannot build those types of
cheap latrines due to the soil quality of their locality. As the soil is sandy, so, the wall of the
pit doesn’t sustain. Then, when they looked for our help, we showed them a manual of
Department of Public Health Engineering. They choose two methods from the manual. The
two methods need bamboo to build sanitary latrine. Finally, in result, 10 people built sanitary
latrine. The villagers announced a plan to make sure 100% use of sanitary latrines in their
village and to ensure sustainable sanitation conditions within that seasonal period.
Different errors and malpractices were identified in case of Government’s baseline survey
and latrine distribution program. The major key finding is, many people are discouraged from
using sanitary latrine as few people get those latrines in free of charge.